...or maybe the Bradbury or the Parker or something but they are giving me a headache... William Birch born 1815 in Walsall, who seems to have had an occupation of a Brafs Dreper (I know, terrible writing in the various census records...) Living in New Street Walsall in 1851, then in Sandwell Street in 1861. Married to an Ann Birch who was 16 years his junior. They seem to have had 6 children, Alfred (b 1851), Mary Ann (b 1852), Betsey (B 1855), William (b 1857) and Joseph (b 1859). Looked all those up on the GRO and their mother has a maiden name of Parker. Now comes the difficult bit......there's also a John listed as the son of the head of the household, born 1849 but his mother's maiden name is Bradbury. I cannot find a marriage entry for a Birch and a Bradbury. Or a Parker for that matter on Free BMD. Just to confuse matters, there was also a William Birch married to a Hannah Birch (Pinner) but that is not the right couple. John, born 1849, is my 2nd GGF but right now, I'd swap him for someone easier to track down. Please pass the gin. Have I missed something or is John not Ann Parker's child?
The only marriage I can find for a William Birch around the right time is:- Marriage date - 23 Aug 1847, Rushall, St Michael William Birch, Full Age, Forgeman, St James St, Ryecroft Father - William Birch, Labourer Anna Pinner, Full Age, St James, St Ryecroft Father - John Pinner, Labourer Denomination Anglican I can't find one to a Parker. Would a Forgeman be a Brass Dresser ? John Birch Baptism date - 21 May 1848 - Wednesbury, St James Father's first name(s) - William - Forgeman Mother's first name(s) - Anna Page - 16 Wednesbury is only 3.2 miles from Walsall
It's not the right couple. That's the other William and Anna (Hannah) who, if you look at the census records, are only 2 years apart in age and my William and his (possibly 2nd wife) Ann, are 11 ish years apart in age. This family I am looking for are Walsall St Matthew parish. 1851 census below Name William Birch Age 36 Estimated Birth Year 1815 Relation Head Spouse's Name Ann Birch Gender Male Where born Walsall, Staffordshire, England Civil parish Walsall Borough Town Walsall County/Island Staffordshire Country England Registration district Walsall Sub-registration district Walsall ED, institution, or vessel 2h Neighbors View others on page Household schedule number 121 Piece 2023 Folio 620 Page number 34 Household Members Name William Birch Age 36 Name Ann Birch Age 26 Name John Birch Age 2 Name Alpen Birch Age 5 Mo
1861 census Name William Birch Age 46 Estimated Birth Year 1815 Relation Head Spouse's Name Ann Birch Gender Male Where born Walsall, Staffordshire, England Civil parish Walsall Foreign Ecclesiastical parish St Matthew Town Walsall County/Island Staffordshire Country England Registration district Walsall Sub-registration district Walsall ED, institution, or vessel 38 Neighbors View others on page Household schedule number 41 Piece 2017 Folio 46 Page number 8 Household Members Name William Birch Age 46 Name Ann Birch Age 35 Name John Birch Age 12 Name Alfred Birch Age 10 Name Mary Ann Birch Age 9 Name Betsey Birch Age 6 Name William Birch Age 4 Name Joseph Birch Age 2
All those kids bar John Birch on the GRO, registered in Walsall have a mother with a maiden name of Parker. But not John.
It may be another of those 'errors' of GRO or who ever wrote it down. I have a few the most recent I have found is for my Tolhurst -Cartwright family [which has enough problems on it's own] Children born are listed as above from 1898 - 1911 with correct mother until the lass in 1907 who has a mother listed as 'Kelly'. Go figure ! [1911 family has taken on wife's maiden name. RG14; Piece: 2768 ] also had that happen in earlier years with another family.
I'm ordering the b/cert as I think that's the only way I'm going to get any kind of confirmation. If it says his father is a Brafs Dreper I am going to cry laughing though
I can't find a marriage anywhere. I wonder if they actually married. Maybe after their first child they lived together as Husband and Wife. There is a possible birth:- John Parker Baptism date - 10 Oct 1848, Walsall Father ------------------- Mother - Ann Parker Snap @MollyMay
I believe he is a definite 1849 birth. It's actually consistent through his life and yes, William and Ann may never have married. Wouldn't be the first couple to have said they were married when they weren't. Or maybe he married John's mother and then went off the idea.......scandal again
Having said that........works, spanner and all that. There is a marriage between a William Birch and a Mary Lowbridge in 1849, also a birth for a John Birch in 1850 Q4 with a mother with a maiden name of Lowbridge.....all in Walsall. Has William been a naughty boy?
From Family Search: would this work out right for your John? John Birch England, Staffordshire, Church Records, 1538-1944 Name: -John Birch Event Type: -Baptism Event Date: -21 May 1848 Event Place: Wednesbury, Staffordshire, England, United Kingdom Event Place (Original): St James, Wednesbury, St James, Staffordshire, England Parish: -St James Father's Name: -William Birch Mother's Name: -Anna Affiliate Image Identifier: D4518/1/1 ............. John Birch England and Wales Birth Registration Index, 1837-2008 Name: -John Birch Event Type: -Birth Registration Registration Quarter: -Jul-Aug-Sep Registration Year: -1849 Registration District: Walsall County: Staffordshire Event Place: -Walsall, Staffordshire, England Volume: -17 Affiliate Line Number: -14 ......... There is a birth-death- burial for a John in 1848 which may have something to do with same family, perhaps a 2nd birth for a son close in age. ......... It may be worth your having a look on F.Search further down where mariages/ spouses are mentioned to see if he fits.
From 1851 to 1911 the censuses have been either end of March (earliest 30th March) or beginning of April (latest 7th April) So any birth after April 5th 1848 would come up as born 1849 as by the time of the census they wouldn't have had their birthday for that year. So say John was born sometime between 10th October 1848 and 30th March 1851 (census date) he would only be 2 years old, giving a birth year of 1849. But were the census taken at the end of December 1851 he would have had his birthday making him 3, giving a birth year of 1848. John Paarker was baptised 30th October 1848. On the 1851 census he would only be enumerated as 2 years old (actually 2 years, 5 months, 8 days) Whereas we would think oh born 1848 census 1851 he would be 3. So John who says he was born in 1849 could have actually been born late 1848.
John is definitely a Walsall and not a Wednesbury though. The entire Birch family on my tree were Walsall St Matthew. The 1849 birth date also ties into his marriage record later in his life. I’m going to dig the lot of them up and shout at them for giving me a headache.
I’m going to have another look again tomorrow. I struggle with dates and numbers as often dyscalculia gets the better of me. Is it too early for gin?
Ok, I can't let things lie.... I am pretty sure that John was born in 1849 but can someone please check my 'rithmetic here. The 1861 census was taken on 07 April and John was 12. John was married on 25 September 1870 when his marriage certificate lists him as 21 years old. I am pretty confident it is him as his father is listed as William Birch, Brass polisher/finisher. If he was 12 in April 1861, and 21 in September 1870, he surely cannot have been born in 1848.
Ok I can see where you are going with this. 21 from 1870 is 1849. But what if he was born October 1848. Then he would be 22 in 1870. But what if when he married in September he hadn't had his birthday yet that year, he would still only be 21. Can't say 100% that the one born 1848 is yours though.
I don't know how old you are. Say you are 20 right now. So born 2000. You get married next june, you are still 20. So june 2021 you are 20. 20 from 2021 s 2001. So you was born 2001. No you was born 2000. Now if you got married in late September 2021 you would be 21. Think of how old you will be next April. Take that way from 2021 and see if you get the correct year of birth. Now think of how old you will be in October next year and take that away from 2021, bet you get the correct year of your birth.
You see, this is why I can't be trusted with numbers. This would make a whole lot of sense. There is ofc the outside possibility that he is not the child of either Ann or William and he's a family member they have taken in. I think it is more likely that he was born beyond the blanket. I also love you for taking 30 years off my age