2 separate 1861 census entries?

Blinks

Member
I’m really stuck on this one so any help would be very, very much appreciated:headbang:

I have a Mark William Gillam in my tree (b. 21-Aug-1855, Shoreditch, Middx, surname recorded as Gillam & mother’s maiden name as Townsend).

His baptism record from 23–Sep-1855 (this time his surname is spelt Gilham) shows his mother’s given name as Elizabeth & his father as Benjamin (occ: Sawyer).

The 3 of them are on the 1861 census living in Bishopsgate, London. Mark is aged 5.

Benjamin Gilliam’s parents were John Gillam (occ: also a Sawyer) and Hannah (maiden name unknown). John & Hannah were both born in Gloucestershire.

Now comes my problem….

I’ve also found a 1861 census for a John (occ: Sawyer) & Hannah Gilham living in Fulton, Gloucestershire. Both were born in Gloucestershire, living with their grandson Mark Gilham, aged 5 and born in London.

The issue is establishing which one of the records is the one for Mark in my tree. I can kind of understand 2 separate entries if the locations were within a few miles (if say one census return was completed in the morning and the other in the evening), but the first record is from London and the second from Gloucester. Surely travelling logistics in 1861 would make it practically impossible for the 2 Mark’s to be the same person?
 
I would bet they are one and the same child. As I understand it, the census schedule would have been delivered before the due date, and if the family were able to fill it in, then they did. If not they had to wait for the enumerator to come and collect it, or fill it in for them if they couldn't, so it is quite possible that when the question was asked of the parents they gave Mark's details, even though he was with his grandparents - or the other way around.
I am sure there is a better explanation out there, but you get the drift?
 
Thanks MollyMay I understand completely. I think you must be right because I can’t think of any other plausible explanation and both census records fit with the other facts in my tree.

Other than that there would have to be an awful lot of coincidences, which though not impossible would make it extremely unlikely to be different Mark’s.

A ‘mark’ of 10/10 for your feedback and quick reply.:)
 
Back
Top