Apologies if I'm posting in the wrong place...
I'm hoping someone will have an idea that might help me. I've been searching for years for the marriage of my maternal 2nd great grandparents - William Taylor and Sarah Ann Rathbone (my direct maternal line) - also with the dfferent spellings of Rathburn, Rothburn, Rathbourne and Rothbourne. He was a journeyman Glass Blower as was his father and brothers. I have her death certificate which gives her age as 31 years in November 1888. Her birth has been problematic, but myself and my cousin narrowed it down to the most logical one of 1857 in Hulme. William was born in 1852 in Manchester. Two of his older siblings were born in Staffordshire and it seems their births were in a workhouse. Now on the 1881 census, he has a 10 year old cousin staying with him who was born in Birmingham.
I've searched via ancestry, findmypast, the local BMD searches online, the local records office (years ago), the local Latterday Saints church library. In fact, I'm not sure at this point where I haven't looked. I cannot find a marriage for the couple anywhere.
At this point, would you give up and assume they just lived together as married, her taking on his surname? Or can you think of anywhere I could possibly search that hasn't as yet occurred to me?
Many thanks in advance - both for reading this post and any ideas you might have!
I'm hoping someone will have an idea that might help me. I've been searching for years for the marriage of my maternal 2nd great grandparents - William Taylor and Sarah Ann Rathbone (my direct maternal line) - also with the dfferent spellings of Rathburn, Rothburn, Rathbourne and Rothbourne. He was a journeyman Glass Blower as was his father and brothers. I have her death certificate which gives her age as 31 years in November 1888. Her birth has been problematic, but myself and my cousin narrowed it down to the most logical one of 1857 in Hulme. William was born in 1852 in Manchester. Two of his older siblings were born in Staffordshire and it seems their births were in a workhouse. Now on the 1881 census, he has a 10 year old cousin staying with him who was born in Birmingham.
I've searched via ancestry, findmypast, the local BMD searches online, the local records office (years ago), the local Latterday Saints church library. In fact, I'm not sure at this point where I haven't looked. I cannot find a marriage for the couple anywhere.
At this point, would you give up and assume they just lived together as married, her taking on his surname? Or can you think of anywhere I could possibly search that hasn't as yet occurred to me?
Many thanks in advance - both for reading this post and any ideas you might have!
