MollyMay
Knows where to find the answers!
I have spent the last couple of days looking at the various baptisms of Mary (Ann[e]) Roberts in the Oswestry area 1866 +/- 2 years. I have been able to match some of those with the families found on the 1871 census, but by no mean any of the children who are not with their parents. None of the baptism, which give the dob match with the 10/2/1866 that Mary gives in 1939
Having had little success with that angle I have looked again at the 14 children that Matthew and Mary named, hoping for some sort of link to Mary's family. There is certainly no Robert used, nor Margaret. The only names that do occur somewhere in those children's name are those that you would expect - Jane (registered as Sarah Jane - Sarah being Matthew's g.ma's name) and Matthew (Walter was registered Matthew Walter), which are Matthew's parent - the others are just common names that everyone seemed to favour - Annie Elizabeth, Mary Ann, William Thomas. The only name I cannot find any connection to the Ruff family is the first son - Charles Arthur, but none of the Mary's I have found have a Charles either.
I really think Mary does not want to be found yet, and am running out of ideas how to pin her down, with any certainty, before her marriage in 1887.
One rather odd thing, and you have mentioned the name Morris - John born 1907. I cannot find a birth registration for him with the mmn Roberts, nor with the name John. There is, however an Albert John Ruff registered in the Sept. qtr 1906 in Atcham for an Albert John Ruff, with a mmn of Morris. So is this just an error, or is he a child of Charles Arthur (only just of age to have fathered a child) which Mary and Matthew have decided to raise? That birth cert might just prove to be interesting.
Having had little success with that angle I have looked again at the 14 children that Matthew and Mary named, hoping for some sort of link to Mary's family. There is certainly no Robert used, nor Margaret. The only names that do occur somewhere in those children's name are those that you would expect - Jane (registered as Sarah Jane - Sarah being Matthew's g.ma's name) and Matthew (Walter was registered Matthew Walter), which are Matthew's parent - the others are just common names that everyone seemed to favour - Annie Elizabeth, Mary Ann, William Thomas. The only name I cannot find any connection to the Ruff family is the first son - Charles Arthur, but none of the Mary's I have found have a Charles either.
I really think Mary does not want to be found yet, and am running out of ideas how to pin her down, with any certainty, before her marriage in 1887.
One rather odd thing, and you have mentioned the name Morris - John born 1907. I cannot find a birth registration for him with the mmn Roberts, nor with the name John. There is, however an Albert John Ruff registered in the Sept. qtr 1906 in Atcham for an Albert John Ruff, with a mmn of Morris. So is this just an error, or is he a child of Charles Arthur (only just of age to have fathered a child) which Mary and Matthew have decided to raise? That birth cert might just prove to be interesting.