Handwriting Experts Needed

Blackmogs

Moderator. General Dogs(cats)body.
Staff member
Can I have my learned Friends' input to the names on these snips please?
 

Attachments

  • snip2.JPG
    snip2.JPG
    78.7 KB · Views: 41
  • snip1.JPG
    snip1.JPG
    73.4 KB · Views: 35
I agree with Ann, and after Rose it might be 'his', in which case the entry could quite possibly continue with 'wife', which we can't see.

Does the format of other entries on the page suggest the use of "and ... his wife"? And does it look as though others have been cut short in the image?
Am off to check.
 
Ta ever so, I had been browsing for ages and got to the point where I didnt trust myself. There was a Richard married to a Rose, but the Rs are definitely different in this entry. Mind you, the vicar had only just begun to mention the wives which I think was normal in tgd 1700s. Unfortunately in spite of extensive spreadsheeting, I cannot connect any of 'my' Burpham Souters to neighbouring parishes. The time when Richard and Mary would have married is missing from the registers.
 
I'm ploughing through the parish registers of Holbeton in Devon, thanks to FMP, and I think the vicar who was filling out the registers for part of the 1600's went to the same school as your vicar - look how he writes his Richards
upload_2019-2-15_14-28-13.png

It was obviously the 'fashion' of the day :D
 
Back
Top